What does "preponderance of evidence" mean in a civil trial?

• A. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt
• B. The evidence is more likely true than false
• C. The evidence is 100% conclusive
• D. A suggestion without evidence

Answer: (B)

In a civil trial, the term "preponderance of evidence" refers to the standard of proof required to prevail in most civil cases. This standard means that one party must demonstrate that their claims are more likely true than false. Essentially, the evidence needs to tip the scale slightly in favor of one side—this is often described as having greater than 50% certainty regarding the truth of the claims being made.

This standard is less stringent than "proof beyond a reasonable doubt," which is typically used in criminal trials and requires a higher level of certainty. Additionally, a preponderance of evidence does not demand that the evidence be 100% conclusive, as absolute certainty is rarely achievable in legal matters. Lastly, a suggestion without evidence does not meet any legal standard because civil cases rely on substantiated claims supported by factual evidence. Thus, emphasizing the comparative assessment of credibility and reliability, the correct understanding of "preponderance of evidence" is that the evidence must be more likely true than false.